Scout — multi-source literature search

Enter a research topic — get real papers from ten live scholarly databases at once, never AI-invented.

What Scout does

Type a topic or keywords (one search — combine terms with semicolons), click Find sources, and get a ranked list of real papers to review, cite, or save.

  • Searches ten live databases in parallel — Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, CrossRef, arXiv, Europe PMC, DBLP, DOAJ, HAL, IETF and CORE — and merges the results.
  • De-duplicates the same paper found across sources, and shows exactly which databases returned each result.
  • Every result is a real record from those databases — Scout never invents references.
  • Fast by default; verify any result's DOI against CrossRef on demand with a per-result Verify button.
  • Copy a BibTeX entry for any paper, or save papers to your Library.
Try Scout →

Why this matters

Literature search usually means running the same query across half a dozen database websites and hand-merging the results. Scout queries ten live scholarly databases at once — Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref, arXiv, Europe PMC, DBLP, DOAJ, HAL, IETF and CORE — deduplicates records that share a DOI, and ranks what's left. Every result is a real record returned by one of those sources; nothing is generated by a language model, so you never get a plausible-looking reference that doesn't exist.

Examples

Search a topic

Query: CRISPR → ranked real papers, each with title, authors, year, venue, citation count and DOI, plus a relevance score and a “confirmed by N databases” badge when the same DOI came back from several sources. A one-click .bib export is built from the page you see.

FAQ

Does Scout invent or summarise papers with AI?

No. Every result is a real record returned by one of the ten databases. No part of the result list is model-generated.

Do I need an account?

No — Scout is free, no sign-up needed. Daily limits apply for fair use.

Why does a paper show “confirmed by N databases”?

That record was returned independently by three of the databases — matched by DOI, or by an exact title match when a source carries no DOI — a strong signal the metadata is correct. It is not a quality score.

Are the citation counts exact?

They are whatever the source reported and can differ slightly between databases; treat them as indicative, not authoritative.

Related

Found sources worth keeping? Save them to your Library to tag and export later. Writing the draft first instead? Cite works claim-first — paste your text and it finds sources for each statement.

More RefScout tools